Javatpoint Logo
Javatpoint Logo

Best Processor for Mobile

A processor is undoubtedly the most important component in a smartphone. The performance of a processor directly impacts the device speed, user experience, gaming execution, and battery durable efficiency. Before buying any smartphone, buyers primarily focus on device processor types and their performances.

Best Processor for Mobile

If you are going to buy a new smartphone or want to know the best ranking and capability of processors, you are in the right place. Here, we will discuss some of the best processors based on their ranking.

A mobile phone containing a fast processor opens your apps in a very short time and does your task quickly with a better user experience. On the other hand, a phone containing a slower (or weaker) processor takes more time to execute even a single task resulting in overheating the device, draining the battery faster (even if it has high battery capacity), and bad user experience.

A mobile processor also plays a crucial role in the gaming experience; even the GPU is also integrated into the chipset itself.

A term Centurion Mark we used which is an industrial-leading technique to determine the performance of a processor. Centurion Mark determines the performance of CPU, Gaming, and device battery capability based on real-world usage. This mark makes it easy for customers to understand the performance of a smartphone without going deep into technical details.

Higher the Centurion Mark betters the processor performance. One of the best smartphone processors is Apple A14 Bionic which is available in iPhone 12 series. After the A14 Bionic processor the name comes Snapdragon 888 and then Samsung Exynos 2100, Apple A13 Bionic, and Kirin 9000.

List of top best processor for mobile based on Centurion mark

Below we mentioned a table with ranking of processors along with Centurion Mark.

Rank Processor Name Smarthone Centurion Mark
1 Apple A14 Bionic Apple iPhone 12 165
2 Snapdragon 888 OnePlus 9 158
3 Exynos 2100 Samsung Galaxy S21 156
4 Apple A13 Bionic Apple iPhone 11 154
5 Kirin 9000 Huawei Mate 40 Pro 152
6 Kirin 9000E Huawei Mate 40 151
7 Exynos 1080 Vivo X60 Pro 151
8 Snapdragon 870 Xiaomi Poco F3 151
9 Snapdragon 865+ Asus ROG Phone 3 150
10 Dimensity 1200 150*
11 Snapdragon 865 OnePlus 8 149
12 Dimensity 1100 Vivo S9 149
13 Snapdragon 780G Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 147
14 Dimensity 1000+ Xiaomi Redmi K30 Ultra 146
15 Apple A12 Bionic iPhone XS Max 146
16 Dimensity 1000 146*
17 Snapdragon 855+ Asus ROG Phone II 145
18 Snapdragon 860 POCO X3 Pro 145
19 Exynos 990 Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 144
20 Snapdragon 855 OnePlus 7 Pro 144
21 Kirin 990 5G Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G 144
22 Kirin 990 4G Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G 143
23 Kirin 990E 5G Huawei Mate 30E Pro 5G 143
24 Exynos 9825 Galaxy Note 10+ 142
25 Exynos 9820 Samsung Galaxy S10 140
26 Dimensity 1000L Oppo Reno3 5G 140
27 Kirin 985 5G Huawei Honor 30 139
28 Kirin 980 Huawei Mate 20 Pro 137
29 Dimensity 1000C T-Mobile LG Velvet 5G 137
30 Snapdragon 768G Redmi K30 5G Racing 136
31 Dimensity 820 Redmi 10X Pro 5G 136
32 Exynos 980 Samsung Galaxy A71 5G 135
33 Snapdragon 765G Oppo Reno 3 Vitality 134
34 Dimensity 800U Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 134
35 Exynos 880 Vivo Y70s 134
36 Snapdragon 765 Motorola One 5G 133
37 Dimensity 800 Honor Play 4 133
38 Snapdragon 750G Motorola Moto G 5G 132
39 Snapdragon 690 OnePlus Nord N10 5G 131
40 Dimensity 720 Realme v3 131
41 Dimensity 700 Realme 8 5G 131
42 Apple A11 Bionic iPhone X 130
43 Snapdragon 845 OnePlus 6T 127
44 Exynos 9810 Samsung Galaxy Note 9 125
45 Snapdragon 732G Poco X3 125
46 Snapdragon 730G Oppo Reno 2 124
47 Kirin 810 Honor 9X 124
48 Snapdragon 730 Redmi K20 123
49 Snapdragon 720G Realme 6 Pro 123
50 Snapdragon 480 Vivo Y31s 122

The performance of * (star) marked processors are determined by their specification, leaked benchmarks, and data gained at testing previous-gen processors.

How to use the above data to evaluate Processor ranking and performance?

Higher the Centurion Mark of processor indicates higher in ranking and better in performance. A processor which has the same or near about Centurion Mark score can be treated as equivalent or similar in their performance. Using this data, you can evaluate which processor from the specific brand (Apple, Qualcomm Snapdragon, Samsung Exynos, Huawei, MediaTek) is equivalent to another.

A processor having above 125 Centurion Mark:

The mobile processor, whose scores are above 125 Centurion Mark, gives excellent performance in all-around experience. They even execute heavy games smoothly as well as heavily used. Such a processor doesn't heat your device while accessing and also doesn't consume more battery. Buying a smartphone containing these categories of processor is always recommended for the best user experience without any performance issue.

A processor having range between 100-125 Centurion Mark

The processor having high performance is mostly used for the gaming experience. If you are looking to buy a mid-range smartphone, you should select a phone whose chipset falls under this range.

A processor having range between 70-100 Centurion Mark:

The processor's Centurion Mark falls between 70 -100 has above-average performance. But you should also check any other lagging or issues before buying a phone. However, some other older chipset like the Snapdragon 810, which has a poor heat performance, may also come under this range. If you want to buy some low-budget phone that gives an above-average performance, pick from this category.

A processor having range between 55-70 Centurion Mark:

The general performance of processors having a Centurion Mark between 55 -70 is below average. But these processors are also accepted in lower-priced phones. These processors (or phones) can sometimes suffer from lag as well as performance issues.

A processor having below 55 Centurion Mark:

The performance of this processor is very low, and you should avoid buying them unless you have no choice and buying a very low-priced phone that costs less than $ 100.

Parameters that impact Centurion Mark

Note: Centurion Mark = Raw Performance + Real-World Performance.

We have tested more than 20 parameters to judge the performance of the processor, but the most common parameters are as follows:

  • Real-World Performance (which includes gaming, browsing, battery efficiency, and general phone use)
  • User Experience
  • Raw CPU Performance
  • Raw GPU Performance
  • Features and Technologies

The difference among Apple A14 Bionic vs. Exynos 2100 vs. Snapdragon 888 vs. Dimensity 1200 vs. Kirin 9000

We think that a single aspect score can't tell the complete story about the processor. Therefore, here we also discuss the detailed flagship System-on-chips (SOCs) in various aspects.

CPU Performance

Ranking of CPU performance of top 5 processors:

  1. Apple A14 Bionic
  2. Exynos 2100
  3. Snapdragon 888
  4. Dimensity 1200
  5. Kirin 9000

While talking about both single-threaded and multi-threaded CPU performance, Apple's A14 Bionic processor beats the rest of all other chipsets. After that, Exynos 2100 and Snapdragon 888 come in the list, which contains a powerful Cortex-X1 derived CPU core. Next to these processors, Dimensity 1200 contains a Cortex-A78 CPU, and Kirin 9000 is at last, which has a Cortex-A77 CPU.

GPU Performance

Ranking of GPU performance of top 5 processors:

  1. Apple A14 Bionic
  2. Snapdragon 888
  3. Kirin 9000
  4. Exynos 2100
  5. Dimensity 1200

A14 Bionic is still dominating the GPU performance; however, the Snapdragon 888 processor is also close to it. After these two processors in GPU performance, Kirin 9000 and then Exynos 2100 comes in the list with their Mali-G78 based GPUs. And at last Dimensity 1200 processor which has Mail-G77 featured GPU.

AI Performance

Ranking of AI performance of top 5 processors:

  1. Kirin 9000
  2. Apple A14 Bionic
  3. Exynos 2100
  4. Dimensity 1200
  5. Snapdragon 888

In AI-related calculations, Kirin 9000 tops, and then Apple's A14 Bionic and Exynos 2100 comes. The Dimensity 1200 and Snapdragon 888 processors are also not too far in this matter.

Fabrication Node

  1. Apple A14 Bionic and Kirin 9000
  2. Snapdragon 888 and Exynos 2100
  3. Dimensity 1200

The Apple A14 Bionic and Kirin 9000 are designed using TSMC's 5nm process (N5), which is better than the rest of the other processors of this list. Processors Snapdragon 888 and Exynos 2100 use Samsung's 5nm LPE process, which comes next.


  1. Snapdragon 888
  2. Kirin 9000
  3. Exynos 2100
  4. Dimensity 1200
  5. Apple A14 Bionic

The modem performance and their ranking of processors depends on network technologies, internet speeds, and features. All of the above processor chipsets support a 5G network.

User Experience

  1. Apple A14 Bionic
  2. Snapdragon 888
  3. Exynos 2100, Kirin 9000, Dimensity 1200

The user experience is calculated based on day-to-day usage performance. All of these chipsets are close in this field.

Youtube For Videos Join Our Youtube Channel: Join Now


Help Others, Please Share

facebook twitter pinterest

Learn Latest Tutorials


Trending Technologies

B.Tech / MCA