Difference between Shim and Polyfill

When using JavaScript there are terms that a developer comes across, which are a shim and a polyfill. Both are very important when dealing with cross-browser compatibility though they are used for different purposes. Differentiating between these two can prove beneficial when deciding as to which environment should be coded for first. In this article, you will learn about the differences between Shim and Polyfill.

Function Definition:

  • Shim: A shim is a piece of code that considers an interface that introduces a new API to an old context. After that, by default, it implements a logic for new features that an old context cannot support.
  • Polyfill: A polyfill is a form of shim which implements the feature if it is lacking in the client environment. It provides functionality that is equivalent to a standard API available in newer environments.

Parameters:

  • Typically, shims and polyfills do not have parameters in the traditional sense. Instead, they check for the existence of certain functions or methods and define them if they are missing.

Syntax:

The syntax for shims and polyfills involves conditional checks and method definitions. Here's a generalized syntax for both:

Shim Syntax:

Polyfill Syntax:

Features:

  • Shim:
    • It adds missing functionality.
    • It is customizable and adaptable to various needs.
  • Polyfill:
    • It mimics native APIs.
    • It ensures consistency with standardized methods.

Advantages:

  • Shim:
    • It can introduce new functionalities.
    • It enhances compatibility with older environments.
  • Polyfill:
    • It provides standardized functionality.
    • It reduces the need for workarounds in code.

Disadvantages:

  • Shim:
    • It cannot follow standard specifications.
    • It can lead to inconsistencies if not implemented carefully.
  • Polyfill:
    • It can increase code size and complexity.
    • It may have performance implications if overused.

Purpose and Scope:

  • Shim: In general, it is focused on the idea of blending and solidifying the gap between different environments by adding new features or modifying the existing ones. While it is capable of serving a similar purpose in merely replicating standardized API layer inside/outside the set cluster zone, it is more general purpose.
  • Polyfill: It is well fitted to the copying of available APIs when they are absent in particular contexts. It also keeps much closer to the standard specifications so that it gives the user a similar experience.

Purpose and Scope:

  • Polyfill:
    • Purpose: It is specifically targets the replication of standardized APIs in environments where they are not available. Polyfills ensure that features defined by standards (such as ECMAScript) are available, mimicking the exact behavior of these features.
    • Scope: Narrower and more focused compared to shims. Polyfills aim to provide a consistent API surface by replicating the behavior of standard features, making it possible to use modern APIs in older environments without changes in behavior.
  • Shim:
    • Purpose: Adds or modifies functionality in circumstances where this feature or pattern or API is missing from the environment. Shims might provide extra or State behaviors that could not correspond to the standardized specification metric.
    • Scope: It is broader and more flexible than polyfills. Such activities can be shims - which are pitched-in solutions that render improved compatibility with the newer code or standards, in the absence of adequate built-in functionality

Implementation Complexity:

  • Shim:
    • Complexity: Shims can involve complex logic to introduce or adapt functionalities. This complexity arises because shims may need to account for varying behaviors across different environments and introduce entirely new features.
    • Example: Implementing a custom event system in a library to work uniformly across different browsers.
  • Polyfill:
    • Complexity: Typically involves implementing well-defined and standardized behavior. Polyfills need to closely follow the specifications of the features they are replicating, which can simplify their implementation but requires precise adherence to standards.

Use Cases:

  • Shim:
    • Use Cases: It is suitable for introducing new features or behaviors that are not part of the standard API but are necessary for application functionality. Shims are ideal for creating cross-browser compatibility for custom or non-standard features.
    • Example: A library that introduces a new method for DOM manipulation that is not available in the standard DOM API.
  • Polyfill:
    • Use Cases: It is best for ensuring that modern and standardized features are available in older environments. Polyfills are essential for maintaining consistency and compatibility with standardized APIs across different browsers and environments.
    • Example: Ensuring that Promise functionality is available in browsers that do not natively support it.

Development and Maintenance:

  • Shim:
    • Development: It requires careful consideration to ensure that introduced or adapted features do not conflict with future browser updates or other libraries. Shims often need to handle a wide range of edge cases and browser-specific behaviors.
    • Maintenance: It can be challenging due to the need to stay updated with changes in browser behaviors and specifications.
    • Example: A shim for adding custom touch event handling in browsers that do not natively support touch events.
  • Polyfill:
    • Development: It focuses on faithfully replicating standard APIs, which can be straightforward as long as the polyfill closely follows the official specifications.
    • Maintenance: It is easier to maintain if it stays aligned with the official specifications because changes in the standards drive updates to the polyfill.
    • Example: A polyfill for the fetch API to provide a consistent way to make HTTP requests across different browsers.

Compatibility Strategy:

  • Shim:
    • Strategy: Shims often provide a higher level of abstraction over existing APIs to ensure compatibility. They might wrap or override existing methods to introduce new behavior or fix issues in older implementations.
    • Example: A shim might redefine the behavior of the addEventListener method to ensure it works consistently across all browsers, even if some browsers have bugs or non-standard implementations.
  • Polyfill:
    • Strategy: Polyfills strives for feature parity with modern standards by implementing missing features directly in the environment. They aim to replicate the behavior of modern APIs exactly as they are defined in the specifications.
    • Example: A polyfill for the fetch API would implement the entire API as specified, ensuring that code using fetch behaves identically across all environments.

Scope of Modification:

  • Shim:
    • Modification Scope: Shims can make broad modifications to the environment. They might add, change, or enhance multiple aspects of the JavaScript runtime, including adding entirely new global objects or modifying existing ones.
    • Example: A shim for enhancing the Date object might add several new methods for date manipulation that do not exist in the standard specification.
  • Polyfill:
    • Modification Scope: Polyfills are more focused and typically modify or add specific methods or objects. They ensure that missing standardized features are available without altering unrelated parts of the environment.
    • Example: A polyfill for Array from would add only that specific method to the Array object without affecting other methods or objects.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, it may be noted that these are both inevitable and complementary components of the JavaScript environment. Shims are general and pervasive, which offer mediating solutions to new and different kinds of problems and frequently bring in new or modified features. On the other hand, Polyfills are more about making sure that standard APIs are present and behave identically, no matter the context. A developer's ability to create programs that are error-free and compatible with a variety of complex contexts for the benefit of end users may be greatly enhanced by knowing when and how to utilize each.