Difference between Low Code Software Development and Traditional Software Development
What is Low Code Software Development?
Low Code Software development is a methodology where the software application developer or coder is required to write less code during the development cycle. It is beneficial as the developer requires less effort and time to develop the software application. The code is reduced by using pre-defined application templates and user-friendly interfaces that can be directly used in the application. This makes developing the product easier and simplifies the deployment process. This is a widely used technique as there is a subsequent increase in demand for IT professionals in the non-IT department due to digitization. This methodology allows people with little coding experience to develop smaller business applications.
Most low-code developers don't use traditional coding to develop the application; instead, they configure it using several graphical interfaces. The developer can use the drag-and-drop method to use these elements in the application directly.
Several platforms allow the user to develop the application using a graphical interface. It will enable the entrepreneur to enter the market by quickly digitizing and setting up websites and applications. The user does not require a development team to build the project, and it provides a quick solution for the business. The entrepreneur can determine the benefits of the application in the industry and be helpful to the customers.
What is Traditional Software Development?
This methodology is also referred to as plan-driven software development. It is a more formal approach when compared to low-code software development. Developing the software begins with determining the user's requirements and designing and coding the software. Once the developer performs these steps, it is followed by testing, support, and maintenance.
The steps performed in traditional software development are also regarded as primary software development methods. These methods require a lot of effort. Each step is complex, and it consumes a lot of time. That's why they are also regarded as heavyweight methodologies. This method depends upon a series of steps, such as requirement analysis, software design, code, and deployment.
This methodology begins with the developers drafting Software Requirement Specifications (SRS). It is the first step performed even before working on the project. Then the team follows all the steps mentioned in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). This methodology is used to build critical systems that are more secure and reliable. If the user requires software with unique features and functionality, then the user may prefer this method.
Low Code Software Development vs. Traditional Software Development
There are several differences between low code and traditional software development. Some of these differences are as follows:
|
Traditional Software Development |
Low Code Software Development |
| 1. |
The traditional approach requires a spread of tools. The developers must perform a series of functions that enable them to develop high-order, complex applications. In order to perform these functions perfectly, the developer requires high technical skills and an understanding of the complexity of all the processes. |
The user can use this methodology by using low-code platforms. Developing applications using the platform involves few tools. This allows the user to develop the application without much difficulty. It makes it simpler for people with nontechnical people to develop software without requiring complete knowledge of programming. |
| 2. |
Since this method requires a lot of technical and programming skills, the development process is a lot more complex as every element is built from scratch. This can generate plenty of bugs, making it difficult for the user to work with. |
These produce fewer bugs. Most of the elements available on the platform are pre-defined, and the user does not require to build the application. The user can drag these elements and make changes to their content, enabling them to build a hassle-free application. |
| 3. |
It is expensive to build custom software using traditional software development. It is because making the software requires a large team of developers. It consumes a lot of time and resources. Thus, high-budget software can only be built using this method. |
The low-code platforms are comparatively cheaper than the traditional alternate methods. The primary reason behind the affordable service of these platforms is that the organization has to pay for the required services. Moreover, it can be a team of developers. |
| 4. |
This methodology is usually used in a giant organization that requires special features and functionality. It enables them to build customized software that cannot be developed using low-code platforms as they have only standard elements. |
This methodology is used by small and medium startups that require software to perform standard functions. This software can quickly build using this method and requires less code and development time. |
| 5. |
The platforms that develop software with the traditional approaches have sophisticated configuration systems. It reduces the agility of the platform. It requires complex coding to develop software. It isn't easy to use the platform. |
Low-code platforms are simpler to use as noncoding professionals can also use them to develop basic applications. It provides options to drag and drop features to add the elements. The user does not require prior coding knowledge as most of the code is written. The developer can use the drawing method to build identical applications. |
| 6. |
It isn't easy to perform maintenance when using traditional coding. It can be a considerable headache to perform maintenance as the updates or any revision in the code may require a dedicated in-house or third-party development team to modify the code. Revising the software while using traditional software development is difficult as the team needs to devise an entirely new plan, design, test, and train the users on further modifications. |
Low code software development provides development platforms that act as APAAS (Application Platform as a Service). The platform is kept operational and maintained by the organization that owns it. The platform's maintenance is more straightforward as the developer does not have to update or modify the application. Most of the updates are managed by the hosting organization. The developer must subscribe to the services required to build and implement the application. |
| 7. |
Using the traditional methodology, web developers use programming languages and web application frameworks to build highly coded websites and applications. It allows users to create more personalized websites, and the user can design each element. |
In this methodology, users use rapid application development tools like Mendix rather than web application frameworks. It allows users to build websites with minimal coding. |
| 8. |
Web applications developed using traditional technologies can easily be deployed on any platform. |
Low-code applications can be deployed faster than traditional applications. However, the user has access to limited platforms as the platform must support all the tools used to build the application. |
| 9. |
It is more expensive to build an application as it requires skilled professionals. |
It is cheaper than the traditional code software development process as the user does not require to hire a team. |
| 10. |
The features of the software are:
Highly adaptable to all systems
It is more efficient and highly scalable.
The testing and debugging of the application require time. |
The features of the software are:
Less integrity
It is less efficient and less scalable.
Live debugging ensure that the application is error-free. |
Can Both Methodologies use together to Build the applications?
- The low-code software development methodology was developed to replace traditional software development. It is impossible to replace the conventional methods in every digital project. But both these methodologies work better when implemented simultaneously to build the application. The user can benefit from both these methods to bring significant business value.
- These two approaches can be simultaneously implemented in the organization while developing projects to increase the development rate and reduce the development cost.
- For example, the developer can use the standard code approach to develop the core functionality of the systems. In contrast, the specialized functions exclusively required for the particular application can be developed using the traditional methodology.
- Moreover, low code results in the democratization of software development because it increases the ability of citizen developers. Citizen developers is a term used for people who have enough business knowledge to develop and build functional applications but lack the programming knowledge in the traditional sense. It enables the individual to develop small applications while professional programmers can invest their time in more concerning issues that require high-level coding skills.
|
For Videos Join Our Youtube Channel: Join Now
