Postman Alternatives

The best collaboration platform for managing APIs is undoubtedly Postman. Postman is a great tool for testing or analyzing RESTful APIs that you have written. It offers a nice user interface for sending HTML queries, eliminating the need to write a large code to check an API's functionality. If you want to switch from Postman or you don't like Postman, then there are many alternatives to Postman available. The postman alternatives are described below.

1. Testfully

This is the best alternative to Postman. There is no need to install any software for this browser-based Postman alternative. Testfully's monitoring & API testing capabilities allow you to reuse tests easily and verify the accuracy of your local and deployed APIs in various environments. This means you can easily test and monitor your endpoints without making any configurations. Testfully stores your requests in the cloud for easy sharing with your team.

Advantages:

1. It provides a free plan for five team members.
2. There is no user count-based pricing scheme.
3. API validation doesn't require any programming. Anyone in your team can utilize it.
4. It supports multiple-step testing, whereas Postman only provides single-step testing.
5. Work together with your teammates by conducting joint testing and data gathering.
6. GraphQL is supported by Testfully's.

Disadvantages:

1. It doesn't support Soap APIs.

2. Swager UI

Swager UI is another substitute for Postman for simpler API visualization and interaction with API resources. Swager UI provides simple, well-organized documentation. Users can easily locate resources and work with them to boost productivity. This open-source application has no dependencies, and you can use it anywhere. It is user-friendly and enables end users to interact with API functions. Swagger UI's best feature is that it is completely customizable. With the help of Swagger UI, a JSON or YAML document become interactive. It builds a framework for organizing and classifying all methods (get, put, post, delete). Paid plans for Swagger UI begin at $ 90 per month.

3. Insomnia

This is the better alternative to the Postman. Insomnia allows you to deliver the best APIs through teamwork. Insomnia's testing suites allows user to develop functional tests for APIs. Insomnia allows you to reuse tests easily and verify the accuracy of your local and deployed APIs in various environments. Users can do modifications without switching between applications by using instant design preview. With the help of Insomnia, your team can develop APIs more quickly. Paid plans for Insomnia start from zero to $ 12 per user per month.

Advantages:

1. Insomnia features an easy-to-use user interface in contrast to Postman.
2. Compared to Postman, Insomnia loads pages more quickly and responds more quickly.
3. You can add programmable random values to your request.
4. Utilize collection to group many API services, so you can concentrate on one at a time.

4. Hoppscotch

An open-source substitute for Postman is Hoppscotch. The Hoppscotch platform's integrated API development tools are really helpful to testers, software engineers, and product managers. It comes with a web client marketed as an "online collaborative API playground," which enables several developers or teams to create, test, and trade APIs.

Hoppscotch is accessible without creating an account. Hoppscotch offers a dedicated user interface for GraphQL, Restful API, and web socket connections. The testing methodology used by Hoppscotch and Postman is similar. It's available for free because it's open-source. If you're looking for a browser-based Postman substitute, you should definitely take a look at Hoppscotch.

Advantages:

1. It provides a free plan.
2. GraphQL is supported by Hoppscotch.

Disadvantages:

1. It doesn't support Soap APIs.

5. Thunder Client

Thunder Client is a substitute for Vscode Postman. It operates as a visual studio code extension. It allows you to group important requests using collections. Thunder Client's UI allows users to specify the desired response code, response time, and response body while testing APIs. The idea of environment and environment variables is supported by Thunder Client, allowing users to store and reuse information across various requests. For a small team that needs simple features like collections, an environment variable, and testing, Thunder Client is an excellent option.

Advantages:

1. It is free.
2. GraphQL is supported by Thunder Client.
3. It does not require any coding skills to use Thunder Client.
4. Soap API is supported by Thunder Client.

Disadvantages:

1. Only accessible as a VScode extension.

6. Firecamp

Firecamp is another substitute for Postman. This is an easy-to-use and cost-free platform for testing APIs and developing Firecamp. It offers numerous useful metrics for API testing, including response time, data on response size, and status codes. Testing WebSockets, GraphQL, and traditional REST APIs are all Firecamp's delicate features. Standalone software Firecamp is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux.

Free users are permitted to add three teammates. Firecamp offers GUI for GraphQL, WebSocket, and Socket.IO. Its collections feature allows you to group different API services and concentrate on one at a time. The starting price for this Postman substitute is $ 9.

Advantages:

1. Postman collections are importable.
2. Separate GUIs are offered by Firecamp for WebSocket, GraphQL, and Socket.io.

Disadvantages:

1. Discovered some issues while testing Firecamp.
2. UI can be challenging.
3. It does not offer a CLI
4. Postman environment files can't be imported.

7. Nightingale

This is the better alternative to Postman. The Nightingale REST client makes it simple to test your APIs without writing a single line of code. Users can call any API with this interactive windows application, send queries, and track results. It offers a straightforward user interface and is simple to install. It offers a variety of facilities, such as workspaces, collections, etc.

Advantages:

1. It is free.
2. Multi-step requests are supported by Nightingale.
3. You can process each request individually.
4. Collections are a great tool for organizing workplaces.
5. Does not require any coding skills to use Nightingale, so anyone in your team can utilize it.
6. Nightingale allows the importation from several clients, including Postman, Insomnia, etc.

Disadvantages:

1. Nightingale is solely a REST client.
2. Assertions are not supported by Nightingale.
3. User management service is not provided by Nightingale. As a result, the team is unable to work together.
4. GraphQL is not supported by Nightingale.
5. It is only compatible with the windows platform.

8. TestMace

TestMace is another substitute for Postman. TestMace is an API testing tool that supports a variety of APIs. Users may simply execute, create, and manage HTTP requests with TestMace. Paid plans of TestMace begin at $ 4 per month for an individual.

Advantages:

1. Global variables are supported by TestMace ( Environment, User-defined, Default)
2. Assertions are supported by TestMace
3. Responses and Requests both are simultaneously displayed.
4. TestMace has the capability to generate random data.
5. Does not require any coding skills to use TestMace
6. "Team Collaboration" is supported by TestMace.
7. The user interface is uncomplicated and easy to use.
8. Export and import are supported by TestMace.
9. GraphQL is supported by TestMace.
10. TestMace's multi-step request feature is used to build sophisticated automated tests.

Disadvantages:

1. There is a lack of documentation.
2. Monitoring APIs is not possible with TestMace.
3. SOAP APIs are not supported by TestMace.

9. Curlx

Curlx is an upgraded version of cURL. Curlx was created by Shivkanth Bagavathy. The cx history command allows you to view previous requests, while the cx collection command allows you to group requests into collections. Curlx stores data in JSON format, making it incredibly simple to version control and share with others.

Advantages:

1. Local storage.
2. The cURL syntax makes it simple to use.
3. Open source and free.
4. Does not require any coding skills to use Curlx, so anyone in your team can utilize it.

Disadvantages:

1. Requires the Node.js runtime, which is available through NPM

10. IBM API Connect

IBM API is a useful API tool for developing, publishing and managing APIs throughout cloud settings. Users may securely expose record systems, services, and databases by using IBM API Connect via APIs. It allows the development of web or mobile apps by protecting and implementing API delivery policies. IBM offers a complete set of tools for testing and monitoring the APIs. It permits to perform automated and group testing to produce high-quality APIs. This software can be used to research, socialize and earn money from APIs. Additionally, IBM API Connect provides a free plan with fewer functionality. IBM API Connect Enterprise per month cost is $ 100 only.